Google – China = Good Business. Who will you trust?

by Admin 18. January 2010 14:31

Anytime a company sides with making money than doing what is right, well let’s face it you can trust them to make a buck. What about saying you’ll do something, and not doing it? That is the position Google may find themselves. Remember when a handshake clenched the deal. Or when it was important to keep a good name?  Sign a contract to suppress free speech? Google, what were you thinking?

Let’s see, we buy cheaper until we find lead in the products destined for our kids.  We are now finding Cadmium in the products destined for our kids from the same source. We trusted the Consumer Product Safety Council. Who knew they didn’t perform tests on all products. (Fool me once) But wait, we still buy from the same source? When I heard about drywall used in Louisiana homes with toxic levels of sulfuric compounds, how surprised was I? Consumer Product Safety Council PLEASE test ALL products from China that either I or my children will use! I know it will cost more, but both my children and I will live longer to use them!

Let’s see if we can figure this out. If an organization that sells toothpicks, advertises “we sell only fake toothpicks”. An anti-wood organization is protesting the business. Instead of opening up their books and allowing independent auditing, they target the protestors, hacking their websites, putting them in jail, forcing companies that want to do business with them to block all anti-wood lovers from being able to browse to anti-wood websites. What could be happening? Who would you trust?

There is one difference; we are talking about life and death. Not toothpicks and wood. Human rights mean Human life.  Part of the preamble from United Nations states:

Whereas disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind, and the advent of a world in which human beings shall enjoy freedom of speech and belief and freedom from fear and want has been proclaimed as the highest aspiration of the common people,

Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protected by the rule of law, ..

http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/

Google pulling out of China will be a gong heard around the world. We are sick of becoming sick from your products. We are sick of your hardball to coerce contracts. We are sick of you not just allowing the hacking of our companies, but organizing and funding them. Call it what you will, I’ll pay more. I’ll choose companies by their ethics, not what they publish, but what they practice.

Google, it’s time to teach the master some yin yang. Yahoo blew it;

http://www.charlescorcoran.com/post/2008/07/30/Information-Highway-A-privilege-or-right.aspx

Who will you trust?  Proverbs 3:5

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags: , ,

GrapeVine | political

Information Highway - A privilege or right?

by SrChasJC 30. July 2008 01:33
 

Re:  http://www.informationweek.com/shared/printableArticle.jhtml?articleID=209601006

 

The Internet should be treated as a "Highway" that has global "laws" governing use and abuse.  We have seen shrinking global authority when it comes to how to handle human rights issues, and blatant country sponsored attacks.

 

The ability to "unplug" nations that can't play nice together seems only natural.  Shame on the US service providers that elect to give in to human rights abuse because it's "legal" in that country. (Fear is the parent of cruelty.—Froude )  If China wants your service they should sign your contract.  Adhering to a countries law in violation to human rights is in essence alignment. (Let the cock crow thrice. —Mathew 26:75)  The past should have taught us that human rights should always reign.  Companies should be held globally responsible to what is tantamount to treason, disclosing information to allow/assist persecution of a human rights victim.  (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treason)  At the very least pay the families involved billions of dollars for the decision to do that type of business with the country. 

It’s not the US’s Internet, nor any countries.  We need common ground, establish some rules when coming to the table, and mind your manners.  Better yet, EARN your license to drive on the information highway.  If you allow your people to attack and break in to other people's computers, you as a country are responsible.  (Get a ticket, suspend after XXX violations)  When a country needs information to assist in law enforcement, where the laws are international, your obliged to give it to them.  When it's not international law, use judgment (play nice), but never violate what is a law in your own country.  They are (China in this case) trying to apply one countries laws to a company in another country.  This should be on the top of the agenda for United Nations and G8 summits.

 

G8 was to launch a international pedophile database:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2005/jun/18/childrensservices.crime

 

G8 countries take action to direct course of nuclear energy:

http://www.cnp.ca/resources/g8-and-nuclear.html

 

G8 to pool data on terrorism:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2005/jun/18/g8.usa

 

G8 commitment to global health lauded by UN agencies:

http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=27322&Cr=mdg&Cr1

 

Currently rated 5.0 by 1 people

  • Currently 5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags: , , , , ,

political

Copyright © 2008 Charles Corcoran
Powered by BlogEngine.NET 1.4.0.0
Theme by Mads Kristensen

About the author

A little crazy, a little conservative, with a dose of normalness sprinkled on for good measure. I try to spend my life trying to get out of the box I'm used to thinking myself into!

Recent posts

Recent comments

Comment RSS

Page List

    Disclaimer

    The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions and do not represent my employer's view in  anyway.

    © Copyright 2008